<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhymes With Really, Deeply Inappropriate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigink.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/rhymes-with-really-deeply-inappropriate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigink.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/rhymes-with-really-deeply-inappropriate/</link>
	<description>HISTORY, WHILE YOU WAIT</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Gently</title>
		<link>http://bigink.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/rhymes-with-really-deeply-inappropriate/#comment-15007</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigink.wordpress.com/?p=822#comment-15007</guid>
		<description>Once all the dust settles, and hopefully Barack is president, the Dems need to address some fundamentals here:  

1.  The degree to which the entire culture has a misogynistic bend, and speaking for myself there are occasions where that sort of discourse (ideological, hegemonic) can creep into my own speech, and those whom I would consider far more adroitly, astutely feminist than I (which really is the tip of the iceberg, obvi:  lotsa solidly credible feminists love "Sex in the City" and are themselves quite capable of slinging out rants that are the female version of misogyny,l for instance).  

2.  When can we finally call out all the Rustbelt and Appalachian "democrats" on their racism?  Racialized politics is one thing:  although the 90/10 split among blacks going for Hillary can definitely be chalked up to race, this is largely about supporting "one of us" to become prez, just as a lot of women have lined up behind Hillary.  This is still regrettable, but not nearly as regrettable as what seems like plain ol' "I don't like the black guy" voting that we've seen recently.  Compare the differences between "working class white" votes west of the Mississippi and those east of the Mississippi.  Um, yeah, that's what I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once all the dust settles, and hopefully Barack is president, the Dems need to address some fundamentals here:  </p>
<p>1.  The degree to which the entire culture has a misogynistic bend, and speaking for myself there are occasions where that sort of discourse (ideological, hegemonic) can creep into my own speech, and those whom I would consider far more adroitly, astutely feminist than I (which really is the tip of the iceberg, obvi:  lotsa solidly credible feminists love &#8220;Sex in the City&#8221; and are themselves quite capable of slinging out rants that are the female version of misogyny,l for instance).  </p>
<p>2.  When can we finally call out all the Rustbelt and Appalachian &#8220;democrats&#8221; on their racism?  Racialized politics is one thing:  although the 90/10 split among blacks going for Hillary can definitely be chalked up to race, this is largely about supporting &#8220;one of us&#8221; to become prez, just as a lot of women have lined up behind Hillary.  This is still regrettable, but not nearly as regrettable as what seems like plain ol&#8217; &#8220;I don&#8217;t like the black guy&#8221; voting that we&#8217;ve seen recently.  Compare the differences between &#8220;working class white&#8221; votes west of the Mississippi and those east of the Mississippi.  Um, yeah, that&#8217;s what I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
